- On Air Program Guide
- A Blue View
- Brain Talk
- Cellar Notes
- Choral Arts Classics
- Gil Sandler’s Baltimore Stories
- Humanities Connection
- Maryland Morning with Sheilah Kast
- Midday with Dan Rodricks
- Radio Kitchen
- Take Five
- The Checkup
- The Environment in Focus
- The First Five Years
- The Morning Economic Report
- The Signal
- Your Maryland
- War of 1812 Stories
- Public Commentary
Should Poor Marylanders Have Free Access To A Lawyer In Certain Civil Cases?
You are missing some Flash content that should appear here! Perhaps your browser cannot display it, or maybe it did not initialize correctly.
December 6, 2013
Like everyone else, we’re thinking this morning about Nelson Mandela. We're reflecting on his legacy and how much he taught us about equal rights and equal justice, not just in South Africa, but everywhere.
Equal justice is an issue we’re talking about in Maryland this morning. There’s a national debate now over whether poor Americans should have a right to a lawyer in civil cases; cases involving critical issues like housing, health, or child custody.
Fifty years ago the U.S. Supreme Court established a right to a lawyer in criminal cases if the defendant can’t afford one. That was the decision Gideon v Wainwright.
But for civil cases, how would such a system work? And, who would pay for it?
Those are questions that a newly created task force in Maryland is grappling with. The task force comprises judges, legislators, and lawyers and is staffed by Pamela Ortiz, Executive Director of the Maryland Access to Justice Commission. She joins Sheilah Kast to talk about it.
Produced by Matt Purdy - email@example.com